Under the current structure, buyers have separate representation and cover the cost of that representation through something called "cooperative compensation". In other words, the seller's agent shares their commission with a buyer's agent via escrow. This effectively allows buyers to finance their agent's commission rather than paying an additional fee on top of everything else, meaning less money out of a homebuyer's pocket upfront. Currently, seller's agents publicize the amount of that commission in their local Multiple Listing Services (MLS); typically 2.5% - 3% of the home's sales price. Under the proposed structure, home sellers may opt to lower the amount they pay their agent, thereby eliminating "cooperative compensation" altogether. Without the ability to publicly display how much, if anything at all, would be shared with the buyer's agent, buyers will work out an agreement to pay their agent upfront. Pros & cons of the NAR changes
The big question ... will a change in commission structure lower house prices?
The answer ... frustratingly, yes and no. Yes, the change in commission will lower house prices, because buyers' budgets now have to account for their agent's fees, thereby reducing the total amount they can afford upfront. BUT, as long as home supply remains low and demand high (surplus of Silicon Valley high wage earners) home prices will undoubtedly continue to rise. My hunch is properties will still sell quickly, with multiple offers, over list price. The only difference will be that the competition pool of those who can actually afford super high properties will get slightly smaller.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Archives
March 2024
Categories |